Chandigarh, June 13
The Punjab and Haryana Excessive Court docket has issued a discover to UT Adviser Dharam Pal to indicate trigger why contempt proceedings beneath the Contempt of Courts Act be not initiated in opposition to him. The discover by Justice BS Walia got here on a contempt petition filed by Chandigarh College Bus Operators Welfare Affiliation by its president Manjit Singh Saini.
The petitioner, by counsel Ranjivan Singh and Kanika Toor, was amongst different issues alleging non-compliance of the judgment handed by a Division Bench on February 10 on a petition filed by the affiliation searching for numerous concessions for the Covid-19 interval.
Ranjivan Singh contended that faculty buses working for personal colleges in Chandigarh have been utterly off street since March 2020 following the Covid-19 outbreak. The varsity solely reopened for bodily educating after two years from April.
It was added that the affiliation had earlier approached the UT Administration on September 24, 2021, by the use of memoranda searching for numerous concessions for the interval by the use of exemption within the motorcar tax and extension of the life span of buses for the interval the automobiles have been off the street. The UT Administration exempted motorcar tax for 2020, however a choice was not taken concerning exemption of the identical from January 2021 until March 2022. Additional, a name was not taken for granting extension in life span to all buses.
The affiliation filed a petition, which was disposed of on February 10 following a press release made by the UT senior standing counsel that the claims have been beneath energetic consideration of the Administration. The UT Adviser was additionally requested to determine the memoranda submitted by the affiliation inside two months.
Nonetheless, the UT Adviser has not taken a ultimate resolution upon the concessions claimed inside the timeframe stipulated by the Excessive Court docket.