CHANDIGARH: The file of the Punjab and Haryana excessive court docket has revealed that the excessive court docket has not examined Haryana’s Parivar Pehchan (PPP) scheme on benefit. The state meeting on Tuesday handed the Haryana Parivar Pehchan (PPP) Invoice, 2021 and through a dialogue on the invoice, responding to some questions raised by the opposition Haryana chief minister Manohar Lal Khattar claimed that the excessive court docket had expressed no objection to the state’s PPP scheme.
After Khattar’s assertion within the meeting on the final day of the monsoon session, the state’s public relations division additionally issued a press launch on Tuesday relating to the PPP invoice and it quotes the CM as saying, “A petition was filed on this regard within the excessive court docket, to which the court docket mentioned that there is no such thing as a objection to the gathering of information for the PPP scheme”.
Threat of Parivar Pahchan Patra database abuse: Petitioner
Examination of the HC file revealed {that a} petition difficult the Haryana authorities’s transfer to collect citizen’s information beneath the PPP scheme was filed earlier than the HC as public curiosity (PIL) by Gurgaon resident Aditya Gupta. It was listed earlier than a division bench headed by Chief Justice Ravi Shanker Jha on July 2.
Through the listening to of the case, the petitioner sought the HC’s permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to both transfer to the authorities by submitting a illustration relating to his grouse towards the scheme or to take up different recourse in his private capability. The HC had not determined the difficulty on benefit in favour or towards the scheme, because the petitioner withdrew his petition.
“The petitioner showing in particular person prays for and is permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to both transfer the authorities by submitting a illustration qua his issues/grievances or take up different recourses out there to him in his particular person capability. Dismissed as withdrawn with the freedom aforesaid,” the HC had held. This order clearly defined that the HC had not determined the difficulty on benefit and solely permitted the petitioner to withdraw his petition to avail another treatment.
The petitioner, on this case, had submitted that by way of PPP, the monetary information of each household residing within the state can be with the state authorities and there’s a excessive threat of the abuse of the database of Parivar Pahchan Patra by the ruling political social gathering for its political beneficial properties.
It was additionally submitted that the mannequin of Parivar Pahchan Patra and its necessary nature for availing the important companies is bigoted and makes a deep reduce on the material of the basic rights enshrined beneath the Structure.
HC has not taken cognizance: AG
“As per my data, the excessive court docket has not handed any order on the PPP. The HC has not even issued discover to the state authorities after taking cognizance of any plea difficult the federal government’s PPP scheme,” Baldev Raj Mahajan, advocate common Haryana, instructed TOI when requested if the PPP challenge has been settled by the excessive court docket.
After Khattar’s assertion within the meeting on the final day of the monsoon session, the state’s public relations division additionally issued a press launch on Tuesday relating to the PPP invoice and it quotes the CM as saying, “A petition was filed on this regard within the excessive court docket, to which the court docket mentioned that there is no such thing as a objection to the gathering of information for the PPP scheme”.
Threat of Parivar Pahchan Patra database abuse: Petitioner
Examination of the HC file revealed {that a} petition difficult the Haryana authorities’s transfer to collect citizen’s information beneath the PPP scheme was filed earlier than the HC as public curiosity (PIL) by Gurgaon resident Aditya Gupta. It was listed earlier than a division bench headed by Chief Justice Ravi Shanker Jha on July 2.
Through the listening to of the case, the petitioner sought the HC’s permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to both transfer to the authorities by submitting a illustration relating to his grouse towards the scheme or to take up different recourse in his private capability. The HC had not determined the difficulty on benefit in favour or towards the scheme, because the petitioner withdrew his petition.
“The petitioner showing in particular person prays for and is permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to both transfer the authorities by submitting a illustration qua his issues/grievances or take up different recourses out there to him in his particular person capability. Dismissed as withdrawn with the freedom aforesaid,” the HC had held. This order clearly defined that the HC had not determined the difficulty on benefit and solely permitted the petitioner to withdraw his petition to avail another treatment.
The petitioner, on this case, had submitted that by way of PPP, the monetary information of each household residing within the state can be with the state authorities and there’s a excessive threat of the abuse of the database of Parivar Pahchan Patra by the ruling political social gathering for its political beneficial properties.
It was additionally submitted that the mannequin of Parivar Pahchan Patra and its necessary nature for availing the important companies is bigoted and makes a deep reduce on the material of the basic rights enshrined beneath the Structure.
HC has not taken cognizance: AG
“As per my data, the excessive court docket has not handed any order on the PPP. The HC has not even issued discover to the state authorities after taking cognizance of any plea difficult the federal government’s PPP scheme,” Baldev Raj Mahajan, advocate common Haryana, instructed TOI when requested if the PPP challenge has been settled by the excessive court docket.
