AHMEDABAD: The Gujarat excessive courtroom on Tuesday directed the Ahmedabad Municipal Company (AMC) to take concrete motion in opposition to 26 highrise industrial buildings, together with sealing, as they don’t possess fireplace NOC.
The excessive courtroom additionally ordered the civic physique to take motion in opposition to 1,128 residential buildings and different 259 highrise buildings that are used for industrial and residential functions. It has given two weeks’ time to the authorities with hopes that the civic physique would take concrete motion in opposition to three classes of buildings and give you a report by June 30.
In the meantime, the HC took discover of the state authorities’s survey of two,160 buildings in municipalities, out of which 1,833 – 84.86% buildings had been discovered current in violation of constructing byelaws, with out BU permission. The courtroom has requested the federal government to search out out an answer to this situation in 5 weeks. tnn
The Gujarat excessive courtroom on Tuesday directed the Ahmedabad Municipal Company (AMC) to take concrete motion together with sealing in opposition to 26 high-rise industrial buildings that don’t possess fireplace NOCs as they didn’t get their fireplace prevention methods audited in time.
The bench of Chief Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice Ashutosh Shastri ordered the civic physique to behave in opposition to 1,128 residential buildings and 259 different high-rise buildings used for industrial and residential functions. The courtroom has granted two weeks’ time to the authorities with hopes that the civic physique would take concrete motion in opposition to three classes of buildings and give you a report by June 30.
AMC submitted that its submitting of felony complaints has yielded constructive outcomes and there was a rush for renewal of fireplace NOC by defaulters.
However the courtroom mentioned, “Mere initiation of felony prosecution or taking motion by initiating a course of aside from not sealing the premises wouldn’t yield rapid outcomes.” The courtroom mentioned that AMC has obtained powers to seal the buildings within the absence of legitimate fireplace NOCs.
The courtroom additional mentioned, “When there are 26 industrial buildings with out fireplace NOCs, it’s excessive time that AMC not solely initiates acceptable motion to make them receive fireplace NOCs but additionally seals such buildings.”
The courtroom mentioned that this was required to keep away from any untoward incident or danger to the lives of occupants. “It will be most acceptable for the company to stop such incidents quite than repenting after such an incident happens,” the courtroom added whereas directing the civic physique to take stringent motion to make the buildings adjust to fireplace security guidelines.
The petitioner on this case, advocate Amit Panchal, urged the HC for fast motion as a result of the problem has been at massive earlier than the courtroom in several litigations for the previous 22 years. He additionally alleged that the felony complaints are being filed in opposition to a sure set of individuals.
The AMC knowledgeable the HC that of the ten,468 highrises and neighborhood buildings, 1,416 had been with out fireplace NOCs. It had filed 45 felony complaints in opposition to defaulters until date and urged the HC to direct the chief metropolitan Justice of the Peace (CMM) to designate extra courts in order that the AMC may file complaints in opposition to buildings with out fireplace NOCs.
The judges mentioned that they might situation mandatory directions whereas directing the CMM to instantly look into AMC’s request for extra designated courts.
The federal government additionally submitted that out of 1,362 authorities colleges throughout the state, 14 had been with out fireplace NOCs and 34 of the 78 authorities schools didn’t adjust to fireplace security guidelines. It promised the HC to make sure they adhered to the rule inside two months.
The chief justice recommended that an enormous penalty, 10 instances greater than what was imposed beforehand, may very well be imposed on the defaulters, “however the state has to give you one thing”, he insisted.
The petitioner complained that the state authorities didn’t place particulars about its survey concerning violation of constructing bylaws in company areas.



Supply hyperlink