“The spectre of corruption once raised, on the basis of material placed on record, cannot be summarily extinguished at the threshold,” stated Justice M Nagaprasanna of the Karnataka High Court, as the court directed the state government to grant approval for the prosecution of IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri. This ruling comes in light of serious allegations regarding the procurement of eco-friendly bags, which has sparked significant public interest and concern.

Rohini Sindhuri, who previously served as the deputy commissioner of Mysuru and the managing director of the Karnataka Handloom Development Corporation, is at the center of a controversy involving a reported loss of Rs 7.5 crore to the state government. The allegations stem from the purchase of over 14 lakh eco-friendly cloth bags in 2021, which were acquired at a price of Rs 52 each, despite the market rate being only Rs 13.

The complaint was filed by NR Ravinchandre Gowda, a lawyer and social activist from Mysuru, who raised concerns over the inflated costs associated with the procurement process. Initially, the state government declined permission to prosecute under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, which aims to protect public servants from frivolous complaints. However, the court emphasized that serious allegations of corruption must be thoroughly investigated.

Justice M Nagaprasanna further clarified, “Departmental proceedings and criminal prosecution operate in distinct spheres, governed by distinct standards of proof and objectives.” This statement highlights the necessity for a clear distinction between internal inquiries and criminal investigations, reinforcing the court’s stance on the importance of accountability in public service.

In a pointed critique of the government’s handling of the case, the court noted that the state had not adequately reviewed the allegations before denying prosecution. The ruling underscores a growing demand for transparency and integrity within the ranks of public officials, particularly in light of the significant financial implications of the alleged misconduct.

As the legal proceedings move forward, the court has ordered the state government to permit the Lokayukta police to file a First Information Report (FIR) against Sindhuri under the Prevention of Corruption Act. This development marks a critical step in addressing the allegations and ensuring that the matter is investigated thoroughly.

Rohini Sindhuri, a senior IAS officer of the 2009 batch from the Karnataka cadre, has previously been involved in a highly publicized feud with IPS officer D. Roopa in 2023, which brought her into the spotlight. The current allegations add another layer to her controversial public profile, as scrutiny over her professional conduct intensifies.

As the situation unfolds, observers are keenly watching for further developments in this high-stakes case, which could set a precedent for how corruption allegations against public officials are handled in Karnataka. The court’s insistence on a thorough investigation reflects a broader commitment to combating corruption and ensuring accountability in governance.

The post Rohini Sindhuri Faces Legal Action Over Corruption Allegations appeared first on berightnews.

Prior to the recent ruling, a student had challenged the Central Board of Secondary Education’s (CBSE) decision to debar him for possessing a mobile phone during his board exam. The student, who arrived 25 minutes late for the exam, claimed he was unaware of the phone in his pocket, and no relevant exam material was found on the device.

Decisive Moment

On March 8, 2026, the high court of karnataka upheld the CBSE’s debarment decision, emphasizing that the board could not provide evidence showing that the mobile had been used during the examination. This ruling marked a significant moment in the ongoing discourse about exam integrity and the consequences of violations.

Immediate Effects

The ruling directly affected the student, who faced the consequences of being barred from the examination process, highlighting the strict measures educational authorities are willing to enforce. This decision also reinforced the importance of adherence to examination protocols.

Related Developments

In a separate case, the high court denied bail to RD Patil, the alleged mastermind behind a series of recruitment examination frauds. Patil was arrested in November 2023 under the Karnataka Control of Organised Crime Act and is facing over 25 criminal cases linked to these frauds.

Expert Perspectives

Justice Rajesh Rai K noted that the prosecution had presented prima facie material indicating Patil’s involvement in a conspiracy to manipulate recruitment examinations. This underscores the judiciary’s commitment to tackling corruption in educational assessments.

Accident Involving Judge

In an unrelated incident, Karnataka High Court judge G. Basavaraj sustained minor injuries in a convoy accident. The accident occurred at 7:30 AM when a truck unexpectedly turned left, causing a collision. Fortunately, all injured parties were reported to be out of danger and received treatment at a nearby hospital.

These developments reflect the high court of karnataka’s active role in upholding educational integrity and addressing criminal activities related to examination processes. The outcomes of these cases will likely influence future policies and enforcement in the educational sector.

The post High court of karnataka appeared first on berightnews.

Before the recent ruling by the Karnataka High Court, there was an expectation that the penalty imposed by the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) on a Class 12 student for carrying a mobile phone during an exam would be overturned. A single judge had previously quashed the penalty, allowing the student to receive his results.

However, on March 7, 2026, a division bench of the Karnataka High Court, consisting of Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha, upheld the CBSE’s decision. The court ruled that the penalty, which included a two-year disqualification from exams, was appropriate and in line with the guidelines communicated to students.

The decisive moment came when the court noted that the student had been found with a mobile phone just 25 minutes after the commencement of his Physical Education exam in February 2025. The CBSE had classified this violation under category-3 of unfair means in exams, which warranted a severe penalty.

As a result of the court’s ruling, the student, who had previously scored 92% in his class 10 CBSE exams, will now face a significant setback in his academic journey. The ruling emphasizes the strict adherence to examination protocols and the consequences of violations.

Experts have weighed in on the ruling, highlighting that the CBSE’s guidelines clearly state that possession of a mobile phone during exams is a serious violation. The court reiterated that the presence of such devices poses a high risk of leaking question papers, which undermines the integrity of the examination process.

The court further emphasized that it cannot substitute its opinion for that of the expert body that ratified the penalty. “When a penalty is implemented after being ratified by a committee of experts, a court cannot neither substitute its opinion with that of the expert body nor dilute the penalty by exercising its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,” the court stated.

This ruling reflects a broader commitment to maintaining the standards of examination integrity, as the CBSE’s decision was supported by a committee of experts during a general body meeting, where the guidelines regarding mobile phone possession were modified.

In light of this ruling, students and educational institutions are reminded of the importance of adhering to examination guidelines to avoid severe penalties. The court’s decision underscores the legal and ethical standards expected in academic environments.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding any potential appeals or further actions from the student or his representatives following this ruling.

The post High court of karnataka appeared first on berightnews.