<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mobile phone Articles &amp; Updates - berightnews</title>
	<atom:link href="https://berightnews.com/tag/mobile-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Latest International News &#38; Sports Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 14:26:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>High court of karnataka</title>
		<link>https://berightnews.com/2026/03/07/high-court-of-karnataka/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sophie Bennett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 14:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bengaluru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[examination guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student exams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair means]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berightnews.com/2026/03/07/high-court-of-karnataka/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Karnataka High Court upheld a CBSE penalty for a student caught with a mobile phone during an exam, reversing a prior ruling that quashed the penalty.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://berightnews.com/2026/03/07/high-court-of-karnataka/">High court of karnataka</a> appeared first on <a href="https://berightnews.com">berightnews</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Karnataka High Court Ruling on Student Examination Penalty</h2>
<p>Before the recent ruling by the Karnataka High Court, there was an expectation that the penalty imposed by the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) on a Class 12 student for carrying a mobile phone during an exam would be overturned. A single judge had previously quashed the penalty, allowing the student to receive his results.</p>
<p>However, on March 7, 2026, a division bench of the Karnataka High Court, consisting of Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha, upheld the CBSE&#8217;s decision. The court ruled that the penalty, which included a two-year disqualification from exams, was appropriate and in line with the guidelines communicated to students.</p>
<p>The decisive moment came when the court noted that the student had been found with a mobile phone just 25 minutes after the commencement of his Physical Education exam in February 2025. The CBSE had classified this violation under category-3 of unfair means in exams, which warranted a severe penalty.</p>
<p>As a result of the court&#8217;s ruling, the student, who had previously scored 92% in his class 10 CBSE exams, will now face a significant setback in his academic journey. The ruling emphasizes the strict adherence to examination protocols and the consequences of violations.</p>
<p>Experts have weighed in on the ruling, highlighting that the CBSE&#8217;s guidelines clearly state that possession of a mobile phone during exams is a serious violation. The court reiterated that the presence of such devices poses a high risk of leaking question papers, which undermines the integrity of the examination process.</p>
<p>The court further emphasized that it cannot substitute its opinion for that of the expert body that ratified the penalty. &#8220;When a penalty is implemented after being ratified by a committee of experts, a court cannot neither substitute its opinion with that of the expert body nor dilute the penalty by exercising its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,&#8221; the court stated.</p>
<p>This ruling reflects a broader commitment to maintaining the standards of examination integrity, as the CBSE&#8217;s decision was supported by a committee of experts during a general body meeting, where the guidelines regarding mobile phone possession were modified.</p>
<p>In light of this ruling, students and educational institutions are reminded of the importance of adhering to examination guidelines to avoid severe penalties. The court&#8217;s decision underscores the legal and ethical standards expected in academic environments.</p>
<p>Details remain unconfirmed regarding any potential appeals or further actions from the student or his representatives following this ruling.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://berightnews.com/2026/03/07/high-court-of-karnataka/">High court of karnataka</a> appeared first on <a href="https://berightnews.com">berightnews</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
