As the 2026 IPL season approaches, Yash Dayal’s absence from the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) squad has been officially confirmed. This decision comes in light of serious legal allegations that Dayal is currently facing.

Since July last year, Dayal has been embroiled in legal troubles, including accusations of sexual assault and exploitation. A POCSO case is under investigation in Jaipur, which has significantly impacted his career.

On the latest developments, RCB’s director of cricket, Mo Bobat, stated, “Yash will not be joining the squad as he is going through a personal situation.” This statement underscores the gravity of Dayal’s circumstances.

The Rajasthan High Court recently denied Dayal interim relief, further complicating his situation. As a result, he has missed the entire domestic season for Uttar Pradesh, raising concerns about his future in cricket.

Despite these challenges, RCB remains in contact with Dayal, offering support during this difficult time. Bobat emphasized, “We’ve been very supportive of Yash to date and that’s reflected in the opportunity to either retain or release players.”

Dayal’s situation has been described as “tricky” by Bobat, highlighting the complexities involved in balancing personal matters with professional commitments.

As the IPL season unfolds, the absence of Yash Dayal will be felt not only by RCB but also by fans and teammates who have supported him throughout his career.

The ongoing legal issues and the investigation into the POCSO case will likely continue to overshadow Dayal’s prospects in the sport.

For now, the cricket community watches closely as the situation develops, with many hoping for a resolution that allows Dayal to return to the field.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the timeline for Dayal’s legal proceedings and any potential impact on his cricketing career.

The post Yash Dayal’s Absence from IPL 2026 Confirmed appeared first on berightnews.

The Rajasthan High Court has made a significant ruling that impacts students seeking access to their evaluated answer sheets. The Court determined that the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS) cannot impose additional processing charges for providing certified copies of answer sheets under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

This decision came in response to a case filed by Vipika, a B.Sc. Nursing student, who sought certified copies of her evaluated answer books. The University had demanded a total of ₹1225 for each answer book, which included a ₹1000 processing fee. The Court quashed this fee, emphasizing that the fee structure prescribed under the RTI Act must be adhered to by public authorities.

In its ruling, the Court referenced D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13783/2021, Vipika vs Rajasthan University of Health Sciences & Anr., highlighting that additional processing charges are inconsistent with the statutory framework of the RTI Act. The Court pointed out that imposing such a high fee discourages students from seeking certified copies of their answer books, which is essential for transparency and accountability in educational institutions.

The Court also quashed the University’s guidelines dated September 6, 2012, and the Board of Management’s decision dated December 20, 2014, which had allowed for these additional charges. It reiterated that the fee payable for seeking information under the Act is already specified by the statutory rules, and public authorities cannot prescribe additional charges that contradict those rules.

According to the RTI Act, the application fee is set at ₹10, with a cost of ₹2 per page for copies of documents. Given that an answer book typically contains around 40 pages, the total cost for obtaining a certified copy should not exceed ₹90, excluding postal charges. The University had also demanded ₹145 for postal expenses, further inflating the total cost.

The Court’s ruling aligns with several Supreme Court decisions that recognize the right of examinees to access their evaluated answer sheets under the RTI Act. This landmark decision is expected to promote greater transparency in public authorities and ensure that students can exercise their rights without facing financial barriers.

As the implications of this ruling unfold, it remains to be seen how RUHS and other educational institutions will adjust their policies in compliance with the Court’s directives. Details remain unconfirmed regarding any immediate changes to the University’s fee structure following this ruling.

The post Ruhs: Rajasthan High Court Ruling on Processing Fee appeared first on berightnews.

The Rajasthan High Court has made a significant ruling regarding the processing fees imposed by universities under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The court determined that universities, including the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS), cannot charge additional processing fees for providing certified copies of answer sheets.

This decision arose from a case involving Vipika, a B.Sc. Nursing student, who applied for certified copies of her evaluated answer books. RUHS had demanded a total of ₹1225 for each answer book, which included a ₹1000 processing fee. The court found this charge to be contrary to the provisions of the RTI Act.

In its ruling, the court emphasized that the fee structure outlined in the RTI Act must be adhered to by public authorities. The court quashed the university’s guidelines that imposed the ₹1000 processing fee, stating, “The fee payable for seeking information under the Act is already specified by the statutory rules and public authorities cannot prescribe additional charges that are inconsistent with those rules.”

The RTI Act aims to promote transparency and accountability in public authorities, ensuring that citizens can access information without undue financial burden. The court’s decision reinforces this principle, making it clear that the only fees that can be charged are those prescribed under the RTI Rules.

According to the RTI Act, the application fee is set at ₹10, with an additional cost of ₹2 per page for copies of documents. For an answer book containing approximately 40 pages, the total photocopy charges would amount to ₹80, plus ₹145 for postal charges, bringing the total to ₹235. This stark contrast to the ₹1225 initially demanded by RUHS highlights the potential financial barriers that could discourage students from seeking their rightful information.

The court also noted that imposing a processing fee of ₹1000 appeared to be an attempt to discourage students from seeking certified copies of their answer books. This ruling is expected to have a broader impact on how universities across Rajasthan handle RTI requests.

As this ruling sets a precedent, it is anticipated that other universities may need to reassess their fee structures to comply with the RTI Act. Further developments in this area are expected as institutions adapt to the court’s decision.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding any immediate changes that universities will implement in response to this ruling, but the emphasis on transparency and accountability is likely to resonate throughout the educational landscape in Rajasthan.

The post Ruhs: Rajasthan High Court Ruling on Processing Fees appeared first on berightnews.

The Rajasthan High Court plays a pivotal role in interpreting laws and ensuring justice in the state of Rajasthan. Established in 1949, it stands as a crucial pillar of the Indian judiciary, addressing civil, criminal, and administrative matters. In recent months, the court has been in the news due to several high-profile rulings and its stance on pressing legal issues, underscoring its significance within the regional and national legal landscapes.

Recent Rulings and Events

One of the landmark decisions from the Rajasthan High Court recently involved a case concerning the rights of marginalized communities. In a ruling that emphasized inclusivity, the court directed the state government to implement policies that promote equality in educational opportunities for underprivileged groups. This decision has been celebrated by legal experts and social activists alike, highlighting the court’s commitment to social justice.

Another important event was the introduction of online hearings to enhance accessibility. The court has now made provisions for virtual appearances, a step prompted by the ongoing challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. These measures aim to reduce delays in legal proceedings and ensure that justice is not hindered by physical constraints, making the judicial process more efficient.

Significance of the Court’s Decisions

The implications of the Rajasthan High Court’s decisions extend beyond the immediate cases at hand. By addressing critical issues such as educational rights and implementing modern judicial practices, the court is setting a precedent for other high courts in India. Its proactive approach has the potential to influence legislative changes at the state level, encouraging the government to revisit outdated laws and adopt more equitable practices.

Looking Ahead

As the Rajasthan High Court continues to tackle significant legal challenges, its upcoming sessions will likely focus on various socio-political issues, including land rights and environmental law. The judiciary’s responsiveness to public interest litigations will also be paramount. Legal analysts suggest that the court may further embrace technology to streamline processes, ensuring that justice remains accessible to all citizens.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Rajasthan High Court is not just a judicial authority but an active participant in shaping the future of law and governance in Rajasthan. With a commitment to justice and reform, the court’s recent rulings reflect a progressive mindset essential for addressing today’s complex societal challenges. Observers will be keenly watching how these developments will unfold in the coming months, as they hold the promise of greater transparency and accountability within the legal system.

The post Recent Developments at the Rajasthan High Court appeared first on berightnews.